「Three types of investigation 三種伺察」修訂間的差異
跳至導覽
跳至搜尋
SSTC yehkina（對話 | 貢獻） 小 （SSTC yehkina 已移動頁面 Three types of investigation 至 Three types of investigation 三種伺察） |
SSTC Serena（對話 | 貢獻） |
||
| 行 1： | 行 1： | ||
The '''three types of investigation''' ([[Wyl.]] ''dpyad pa gsum'') refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture<ref>Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, ''Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition'', p.221n55</ref>. | The '''three types of investigation''' ([[Wyl.]] ''dpyad pa gsum'') refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture<ref>Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, ''Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition'', p.221n55</ref>. | ||
| − | # the demonstration of what is evident (''mngon gyur'') is not invalidated by [[direct perception]] (''mngon sum''), | + | # the demonstration of what is evident (''mngon gyur''現前分) is not invalidated by 現量[[direct perception]] (''mngon sum''), |
| − | # the demonstration of what is hidden (''lkog gyur'') is not invalidated by [[inference]] (''rjes dpag''), | + | # the demonstration of what is hidden (''lkog gyur''不現前分或隱蔽分) is not invalidated by 比量[[inference]] (''rjes dpag''), |
| − | # the demonstration of what is extremely hidden (''shin tu lkog gyur'') is not contradicted (internally) by previous or later statements.<ref>The third point is sometimes abbreviated as the criteria of ''scriptural authority''. See '''Mipham Rinpoche:''' ''The Adornment of the Middle Way'', p.393, n115.</ref> | + | # the demonstration of what is extremely hidden (''shin tu lkog gyur''最極隱蔽分) is not contradicted (internally) by previous or later statements.<ref>The third point is sometimes abbreviated as the criteria of 聖言''scriptural authority''. See '''Mipham Rinpoche:''' ''The Adornment of the Middle Way'', p.393, n115.</ref> |
| − | + | ||
from '''[[Mipham Rinpoche]]''', ''[[Words to Delight My Teacher Manjughosha]]''<ref>'''Mipham Rinpoche:''' ''The Adornment of the Middle Way'', p.375: "But here we have the perfect teachings of the Tathagata, excellent in their beginning, middle, and end. These are like gold that is smelted, cut, and polished; they can withstand threefold examination and are not faulted by perception, inference, or verbal inconsistency."</ref> | from '''[[Mipham Rinpoche]]''', ''[[Words to Delight My Teacher Manjughosha]]''<ref>'''Mipham Rinpoche:''' ''The Adornment of the Middle Way'', p.375: "But here we have the perfect teachings of the Tathagata, excellent in their beginning, middle, and end. These are like gold that is smelted, cut, and polished; they can withstand threefold examination and are not faulted by perception, inference, or verbal inconsistency."</ref> | ||
於 2021年5月23日 (日) 16:38 的修訂
The three types of investigation (Wyl. dpyad pa gsum) refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture[1].
- the demonstration of what is evident (mngon gyur現前分) is not invalidated by 現量direct perception (mngon sum),
- the demonstration of what is hidden (lkog gyur不現前分或隱蔽分) is not invalidated by 比量inference (rjes dpag),
- the demonstration of what is extremely hidden (shin tu lkog gyur最極隱蔽分) is not contradicted (internally) by previous or later statements.[2]
from Mipham Rinpoche, Words to Delight My Teacher Manjughosha[3]
References
- ↑ Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition, p.221n55
- ↑ The third point is sometimes abbreviated as the criteria of 聖言scriptural authority. See Mipham Rinpoche: The Adornment of the Middle Way, p.393, n115.
- ↑ Mipham Rinpoche: The Adornment of the Middle Way, p.375: "But here we have the perfect teachings of the Tathagata, excellent in their beginning, middle, and end. These are like gold that is smelted, cut, and polished; they can withstand threefold examination and are not faulted by perception, inference, or verbal inconsistency."
