「Three types of investigation 三種伺察」修訂間的差異

出自Decode_Wiki
跳至導覽 跳至搜尋
 
(未顯示同一使用者於中間所作的 1 次修訂)
行 1: 行 1:
 
The '''three types of investigation''' ([[Wyl.]] ''dpyad pa gsum'') refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture<ref>Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, ''Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition'', p.221n55</ref>.
 
The '''three types of investigation''' ([[Wyl.]] ''dpyad pa gsum'') refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture<ref>Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, ''Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition'', p.221n55</ref>.
# the demonstration of what is evident (''mngon gyur'') is not invalidated by [[direct perception]] (''mngon sum''),
+
# the demonstration of what is evident (''mngon gyur'', 現前分) is not invalidated by 現量 [[direct perception]] (''mngon sum''),
# the demonstration of what is hidden (''lkog gyur'') is not invalidated by [[inference]] (''rjes dpag''),
+
# the demonstration of what is hidden (''lkog gyur'', 不現前分或隱蔽分) is not invalidated by 比量 [[inference]] (''rjes dpag''),
# the demonstration of what is extremely hidden (''shin tu lkog gyur'') is not contradicted (internally) by previous or later statements.<ref>The third point is sometimes abbreviated as the criteria of ''scriptural authority''. See '''Mipham Rinpoche:''' ''The Adornment of the Middle Way'', p.393, n115.</ref>
+
# the demonstration of what is extremely hidden (''shin tu lkog gyur'', 最極隱蔽分) is not contradicted (internally) by previous or later statements.<ref>The third point is sometimes abbreviated as the criteria of 聖言''scriptural authority''. See '''Mipham Rinpoche:''' ''The Adornment of the Middle Way'', p.393, n115.</ref>
 
+
 
from '''[[Mipham Rinpoche]]''', ''[[Words to Delight My Teacher Manjughosha]]''<ref>'''Mipham Rinpoche:''' ''The Adornment of the Middle Way'', p.375: "But here we have the perfect teachings of the Tathagata, excellent in their beginning, middle, and end. These are like gold that is smelted, cut, and polished; they can withstand threefold examination and are not faulted by perception, inference, or verbal inconsistency."</ref>
 
from '''[[Mipham Rinpoche]]''', ''[[Words to Delight My Teacher Manjughosha]]''<ref>'''Mipham Rinpoche:''' ''The Adornment of the Middle Way'', p.375: "But here we have the perfect teachings of the Tathagata, excellent in their beginning, middle, and end. These are like gold that is smelted, cut, and polished; they can withstand threefold examination and are not faulted by perception, inference, or verbal inconsistency."</ref>
  

於 2021年5月23日 (日) 16:38 的最新修訂

The three types of investigation (Wyl. dpyad pa gsum) refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture[1].

  1. the demonstration of what is evident (mngon gyur, 現前分) is not invalidated by 現量 direct perception (mngon sum),
  2. the demonstration of what is hidden (lkog gyur, 不現前分或隱蔽分) is not invalidated by 比量 inference (rjes dpag),
  3. the demonstration of what is extremely hidden (shin tu lkog gyur, 最極隱蔽分) is not contradicted (internally) by previous or later statements.[2]

from Mipham Rinpoche, Words to Delight My Teacher Manjughosha[3]

References

  1. Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition, p.221n55
  2. The third point is sometimes abbreviated as the criteria of 聖言scriptural authority. See Mipham Rinpoche: The Adornment of the Middle Way, p.393, n115.
  3. Mipham Rinpoche: The Adornment of the Middle Way, p.375: "But here we have the perfect teachings of the Tathagata, excellent in their beginning, middle, and end. These are like gold that is smelted, cut, and polished; they can withstand threefold examination and are not faulted by perception, inference, or verbal inconsistency."