Three types of investigation 三種伺察

出自Decode_Wiki
跳至導覽 跳至搜尋

The three types of investigation (Wyl. dpyad pa gsum) refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture[1].

  1. the demonstration of what is evident (mngon gyur, 現前分) is not invalidated by 現量 direct perception (mngon sum),
  2. the demonstration of what is hidden (lkog gyur, 不現前分或隱蔽分) is not invalidated by 比量 inference (rjes dpag),
  3. the demonstration of what is extremely hidden (shin tu lkog gyur, 最極隱蔽分) is not contradicted (internally) by previous or later statements.[2]

from Mipham Rinpoche, Words to Delight My Teacher Manjughosha[3]

References

  1. ↑ Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition, p.221n55
  2. ↑ The third point is sometimes abbreviated as the criteria of 聖言scriptural authority. See Mipham Rinpoche: The Adornment of the Middle Way, p.393, n115.
  3. ↑ Mipham Rinpoche: The Adornment of the Middle Way, p.375: "But here we have the perfect teachings of the Tathagata, excellent in their beginning, middle, and end. These are like gold that is smelted, cut, and polished; they can withstand threefold examination and are not faulted by perception, inference, or verbal inconsistency."

取自 "http://waterbel.diskstation.me/Decode_Wiki/index.php?title=Three_types_of_investigation_三種伺察&oldid=36346"